<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>5th Ed - Eldar</title>
        <link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/topic/5113/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ So my Eldar army will need a serious rebuild in 5th ed. My list (much like a lot of Eldar) is pretty light on troops. (I use two min jetbike squads). So about
as light on troops as possible:


I think Eldar are going to radically change to be large troop based forces. So what do you think of the trrop choices in 5th ed?


- Rangers/Pathfinders

- Wraithguard

- Jetbikes

- Dire Avengers

- Guardians


Pete
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:27:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47789/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In retro spect I know why he&#39;s so doomsaying...he&#39;s a guard player.
<br>
<br>
once again, thanks for filling me in on the good info ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (modifiedmax)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47789</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47788/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Alright, it doesnt seem so bad now. lol
<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve just been listening to my brother. he&#39;s a doom sayer on evrything 5th edition. I havent really looked to much into it myself. my arny is a realy
mechanized one. several warwalkers, wraithlords,wraithguard. plus the three falcons two serpents and two fireprisms. All I could gwt from my bro was
&quot;skimmers are going to suck, I&#39;d sell them now before it&#39;s to late&quot; and what not. so I was kinda worried.
<br>
<br>
thanks... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (modifiedmax)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47788</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47732/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just jest (must be some deep rooted anti-eldar sentiment... go figure:lol). I actually really do like the cover save more than the current auto-glancing
system that is in place. In the end it&#39;ll make skimmers less reliable to not get destroyed outright. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Ronen Warrior)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47732</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 16:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47715/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47715</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ronen the rerollable cover save will be usefull for maby one turn, not actualy a big deal (usefull in certain situations though) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47715</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 04:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47714/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Feckin&#39; eldar and rerollable fortuned falcons. Like the things really needed to be any more survivable than they already were?!?!?! Here I was hoping that
5th ed would make people go out and purchase things other than falcons. edit: I really do like the walker rules. Running and being able to shoot all the
weapons is badass. I can see warwalkers (especially since they scout no?) starting to make it into more and more lists. The walker rules also make me want to
find a reasonable... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Ronen Warrior)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47714</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 03:49:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47711/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good call. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mannahnin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47711</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 03:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47705/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 3rd with another farseer ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47705</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47699/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 2 with Eldrad. The third power has to be something different. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mannahnin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47699</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:46:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47680/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47680</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ...or 3 with eldrad <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47680</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47666/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good thing you can only fortune 1 or 2 things a turn. <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (The Gunslinger)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47666</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47633/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I know I&#39;ve been thinking a lot about 3 fire prisms with Eldrad and another farseer. You could keep are ridiculous pay load coming out of those 3 tanks.
<br>
<br>
The other thought I had was units like Dark reapers in 3+ cover or something like war walkers hunkered down in cover.
<br>
<br>
Even wave serpents with re rollable saves get ridiculous to the point that people will simply not shoot them.
<br>
<br>
Pete ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47633</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:58:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47628/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Humm, another thaught for eldar - Fortune your tanks!!!
<br>
<br>
and reroll that cover save.
<br>
<br>
The truley unkillable falcon... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47628</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47614/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Indeed from a quick stat check they actualy get harder to kill via shooting, and slightly easier to kill via CC, so - NO WHINING!!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47614</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:09:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47612/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I don&#39;t see why... They are just as good now. Just a little different.
<br>
<br>
Unless your being sarcastic, in which case, go cry about your assault cannons <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif">
<br>
<br>
Pete ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47612</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:00:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47559/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47559</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m still kinda ticked on the new skimmer rules. I LIKED MY CHEESE VEHICLES!!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (modifiedmax)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47559</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:24:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47527/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47527</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You know another thing I just realized is that the EML is a S4 weapon so can be considered a defensive weapon. So you can EML and shiken cannon in the same
turn, or shoot the S8 shot. Seems really flexible.
<br>
<br>
Pete ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47527</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47375/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47375</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hmmmm... Good point. I wonder if tanks are going to be considered higher than troops and can fire over intervening troops. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47375</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47356/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47356</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Indeed with the improved cover saves I think anything that ignores it will be a big deal, however if ap1, ap2, and so forth ignore FNP then it&#39;s going to
lose a lot of usibility for thoes units it&#39;s excedingly usefull to get some verity of save against thoes shots. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ZiggyQubert)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47356</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47346/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Brookie what do you think about cover ignoring powers and weapons in the next edition.
<br>
<br>
I think the ability to take things like dire dragon exarchs that ignore cover and EML with plasma missiles is a pretty big deal. A couple wave serpents with
EMLs will paste units like lootas or rangers hunkered in cover.
<br>
<br>
Pete ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47346</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/reply/47340/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html#reply-47340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I cheated a little on the falcon math so I didn&#39;t have to break apart glances and pens, but you get the idea. They basically get better under the new rules
from a shooting perspective and worse under the new rules from a hth perspective.
<br>
<br>
Lol. Thanks for call me out though <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif">
<br>
<br>
Pete ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/sreply/47340</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 5th Ed - Eldar ]]></title>
			<link>http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/topic/5113/t/5th-Ed-Eldar.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So my Eldar army will need a serious rebuild in 5th ed. My list (much like a lot of Eldar) is pretty light on troops. (I use two min jetbike squads). So about
as light on troops as possible:
<br>
<br>
I think Eldar are going to radically change to be large troop based forces. So what do you think of the trrop choices in 5th ed?
<br>
<br>
- Rangers/Pathfinders
<br>
- Wraithguard
<br>
- Jetbikes
<br>
- Dire Avengers
<br>
- Guardians
<br>
<br>
Pete
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deFL0)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://warmongerboard.yuku.com/topic/5113</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>